Wichita State
Men -
Women
2014
-
2015 -
2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
356 |
Brady Johnson |
JR |
32:41 |
456 |
Ugis Jocis |
SR |
32:54 |
462 |
Paul Raymond |
SR |
32:55 |
530 |
Kyle Larkin |
SO |
33:03 |
824 |
Gage Garcia |
SO |
33:32 |
861 |
Dray Carson |
SO |
33:35 |
951 |
Nathan Wickoren |
SR |
33:42 |
1,048 |
Reno Law |
FR |
33:51 |
|
National Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Regional Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 in Regional |
0.1% |
Top 10 in Regional |
46.6% |
Top 20 in Regional |
100.0% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Brady Johnson |
Ugis Jocis |
Paul Raymond |
Kyle Larkin |
Gage Garcia |
Dray Carson |
Nathan Wickoren |
Reno Law |
Chile Pepper Festival |
10/02 |
972 |
32:05 |
32:58 |
32:56 |
33:04 |
33:52 |
34:02 |
33:46 |
33:57 |
D1 Pre-Nationals (Red) |
10/17 |
1018 |
33:09 |
32:44 |
32:58 |
33:00 |
33:03 |
|
33:22 |
33:37 |
Missouri Valley Championships |
10/31 |
1019 |
32:42 |
32:51 |
33:12 |
32:58 |
33:27 |
33:14 |
33:31 |
34:02 |
Midwest Region Championships |
11/13 |
1029 |
32:42 |
33:06 |
32:36 |
33:13 |
33:52 |
|
34:35 |
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region Championship |
100% |
10.7 |
318 |
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
1.5 |
4.5 |
8.7 |
14.2 |
17.4 |
19.9 |
15.1 |
9.3 |
5.2 |
2.7 |
0.7 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Brady Johnson |
42.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
0.0 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
0.7 |
0.9 |
0.8 |
1.4 |
1.7 |
1.6 |
Ugis Jocis |
54.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
Paul Raymond |
54.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
|
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
Kyle Larkin |
63.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
Gage Garcia |
96.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dray Carson |
101.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nathan Wickoren |
110.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
5 |
0.1% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
5 |
6 |
1.5% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
6 |
7 |
4.5% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
7 |
8 |
8.7% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
8 |
9 |
14.2% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
9 |
10 |
17.4% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
10 |
11 |
19.9% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.9 |
|
|
11 |
12 |
15.1% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.1 |
|
|
12 |
13 |
9.3% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
13 |
14 |
5.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
14 |
15 |
2.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
15 |
16 |
0.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
16 |
17 |
0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
17 |
18 |
0.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
18 |
19 |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
19 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
21 |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
21 |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
Total |
100% |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
North Texas |
0.5% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
|
Total |
|
|
0.0 |
|
Minimum |
|
|
0.0 |
Maximum |
|
|
1.0 |